Menu

Ann Nolan

Plan For The Perfect Home

Sujit Choudhry Featured In Essay Collection On Constitutional Transitions

Recently, a collection of essays entitled “Territory and Power in Constitutional Transitions” was published. This book consists of 17 different case studies and a companion policy paper that was written by Sujit Choudhry and George Anderson. This companion paper is entitled with the same name as the collection itself. The purpose of this companion paper that was co-written by Sujit Choudhry was to provide some insights on how issues over territory can impact how a constitution is made and designed. Also, the authors also provide advice that is potentially useful to people who are involved in constitutional moments.

“Territory and Power in Constitutional Transitions” can be purchased on amazon either in digital or hardcover format. The policy paper that was written by Sujit Choudhry and Anderson can be downloaded separately as well. Sujit Choudhry is considered an expert on constitutional law and founded the organization known as the Center for Constitutional Transitions in which he is also the Director. He has been recognized for his work in constitutional law on an international level. Some of the countries that he has worked with during his decades-long career include Yemen, Tunisia, Ukraine, Sri Lanka, South Africa, Nepal, Libya, Jordan, Myanmar, and Egypt.

The view that the essay collection offers is a realist one that keeps in mind just how complex these issues tend to be. The authors featured in the collection use examples from Ukraine, Sri Lanka, Nigeria, Nepal, Spain, Kenya, Cyprus, Iraq, and more. The policy paper that features the work of Sujit Choudhry is a good companion for the publication that addresses many different issues when it comes to territorial politics in regards to building a constitution. The final chapter of the work is used to conclude the different works and how it all relates to research that has already taken place.

Find out more here https://www.instagram.com/sujitchoudhry/

Sujit-Choudhry and Constitutional-making Processes and Design

“Territory and Power in Constitutional Transitions” is a compilation of essays edited by Sujit Choudhry and George Anderson. These essays present policy recommendations formed from an objective view of the intricacies that are most relevant to current conflicts such as those in Yemen, Myanmar and Libya. They also describe the many challenges posed by territorial disagreements in the constitution-making processes, as well as in constitutional design. Praised by renowned figures involved in political affairs, this volume of essays is a must-read for scholars of consociational power-sharing arrangements, federalism, devolution and asymmetric devolution. For, the extensive analysis and in-depth case studies permit unparalleled conclusions relevant for both advisors and practitioners.

Along with the release of these essays, Choudhry and Anderson have authored an accompanying policy paper under the same title. This paper has the purpose of providing insights into how claims of territories relate to the processes of constitution-making and constitutional design. The essays also offer advice that may prove useful to “principals and advisors engaged in constitutional moments.” The former CEO of the Forum of Federations and the former deputy minister for the government of Canada, Anderson has worked for the United Nations Department of Political Affairs and consulted with leaders around the globe. Sujit-Choudhry is recognized internationally as an authority on comparative constitutional law and has lectured in 30 countries. He has been consulted for more than 20 years regarding constitution building, rule of law processes and governance in such countries as Jordan, Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Nepal, Yemen and Ukraine.

Sujit-Choudhry has worked in many contexts, some of which have been ceasefires and conditions of political violence. He has offered legal counsel on complex constitutional and policy issues to Canadian governments, private corporations, royal commissions, public sector agencies and NGOs. As Founder and Director of the Center for Constitutional Transitions (CT),he provides technical advice to public and multi-party dialogues, and he drafts technical reports and field memoranda.

Sources:

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/sujit-choudhry-george-anderson-edit-125900727.html

Find out more here http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-07-01/news/51002515_1_uc-berkeley-law-school-sujit-choudhry-legal-education

Bio

Kisling, Nestico & Redick and the Webby award

On June 28, 2019, the website Kisling, Nestico & Redick was given a Webby award for one of the best sites on the web. The Webby award is considered as a prestigious honor by the New York Times News. Kisling, Nestico & Redick won the distinct honor of within the category associated with the law. 

Kisling, Nestico & Redick is one of the fastest growing law firms for legal services pertaining to personal injury. The firm provides legal representation to people who have been involved in automobile accidents and work related accidents. The company has recovered more than $450 Million settlements and verdicts. They are located in the state of Ohio and was founded in 2005. The firm has 11 locations throughout the state, 130 dedicated staff members who provide support, and a total of 39 lawyers who advocate relentlessly on behalf of all their clients. 

An Internet website is commonly the first place one would go to gather information about companies and businesses. Rob Nestico a partner and manager at Kisling, Nestico & Redick agrees that websites make a lasting impression with potential clients. Most of the time its a business’s very first impression. A successful website should be user friendly and capable of providing answers that a client might have. Claire Graves, the executive director of the Webby Awards, states that this law firm set the standard for creativity and innovation on the web. It was selected from 13,000 entries. 

Sujit Choudhry on Presidential Powers

There is no doubt that the president enjoys many privileges and powers. However, there comes a time when some of these privileges are put to question. As much as the president of the United States has been mandated to make appointments and fire some government executives, there is always a red line with which he has to play safe. Sujit Choudhry a renowned lawyer recently went ahead to analyze on whether the president has the powers to revoke security clearances under the former national security personnel. He looks at this aspect in reference to what the constitution says.

This debate was sparked by the recent move by President Trump to revoke the security clearance that has been accorded to John Brennan. Apart from this he also made an announcement to the effect that he was also planing to revoke the security clearances for other retired national security community members. According to the press secretary for the white house, president Trump was considering taking this action because the culprits have monetized and politicized their security clearance and public service.

One may ask why former members of the national security should still enjoy their security clearances even after leaving the public service job. This is basically based on the fact that in the course of their service, they gain a lot of knowledge with regard to the workings of the government and thus would come in handy to advice current security officials when need be.

In regards to the powers of the president to revoke these security clearances, Sujit Choudhry notes that the constitution remains mum on this front. As much as there are specific procedures clearly outlined in the Executive orders regarding these clearances, some legal minds have reasoned that the president has the privilege of ignoring or circumventing them.

Sujit Choudhry is an internationally recognized figure on matters related to constitutional transition thanks to his mastery of comparative constitutional law and politics. He has been a key figure in the constitutional building process for various countries including Jordan, Egypt, Nepal, Myanmar, Libya, Sri Lanka South Africa, Yemen and Ukraine.

Read more here https://medium.com/@SujitChoudhry

Todd Levine Anchors his law company to Global Recognition

There are many prominent litigation firms in America. Kluger Kaplan Litigation Company from Miami is one of them. The private company that operates from its offices located in Boca Raton, Minneapolis, and Miami has built its brand in the industry over the years. The lead lawyers in the company, Todd Levine, Alan Kluger, and Abbey Kaplan do not disappoint in the manner they execute their duties. The three recently won the recognition of an institution recognizing the best in the industry. Each lawyer got the honor in a particular category of the Real Estate Litigation.

Kluger Kaplan got the recognition in the Mergers and Acquisitions, Entertainment Law, and Commercial Litigation. Kaplan is an experienced lawyer specializing in complicated legal matters in the commercial litigation category. Some of the areas of specialization that Kaplan handles include liability, contract, and the development of real estate disputes. He also has interests in intellectual property and corporate finance matters.

Philippe Lieberman and Steve Silverman settled in the commercial litigation skills category. Bruce Katzen got recognition in the commercial litigation and Capital Market Law, Securities while Business, and commercial litigation, as well as Banking, went to Allan Kluger. He shared the Family Law category with Jason Marks. Kluger is a lawyer with a history of representing big businesses and individuals in complicated cases. His approach to the issue involves a proper understanding of the law, top-notch preparation procedure, and unmatched attention strategy.

Allan Kluger, one of the company’s founding member, expressed his joy as the congratulated the others for their achievements. He noted that their recognition was enough to prove that the company constitutes of professionals ready to serve the clients in a significant way. Kluger is a good player in philanthropy. He supports various charities through his Dean-Kluger Charitable Foundation.

Todd Levine, a founding member of kluger kaplan, is a law graduate lawyer with outstanding experience in the industry. The lawyer is an expert in almost every fields that the company covers. Levine is a musician and an artist that developed a knack for litigated at an early stage.

Read more on Levine’s law company https://www.avvo.com/attorneys/33131-fl-todd-levine-1281820.html

Rick Cofer and Efforts to Implement Recycling in Parks

The banning of single use plastic has become widespread across the world. More cities are implementing laws and bans to help the environment and create a healthier lifestyle and world for the upcoming generations. However, in 2018, Austin residents were disappointed to learn that Texas Supreme Court made a decision to dismantle the ban of single use plastic. Many of the residents of Austin will continue to use reusable bags instead of plastic, despite the decision.

Rick Cofer, a criminal defense attorney in Travis county and a chairman of the Austin Parks and Recreation, agrees in the banning of single plastic use and believes that retailers will uphold that ban despite plastic still being available. Rick Cofer also serves in many different non-profits that benefit the environment, one of them being chairman of the Austin Zero Waste Commission, where he has led communities into recycling more and using less plastic. Since the ban on single plastic use was reversed, he has made it a mission to create more recycling areas available in parks. There are many parks that have no recycling whatsoever, so Rick Cofer has proposed different plans and budgets to make that a reality.

Two of the proposals of budget plans that the Parks and Recreation Recycling Task Force have presented are:

Option A: A one-year plan that would cost more than $1.3 million, and that money would come from the city’s budget, donors, and from a monthly clean community fee increase of 31 cents.

Option B: A two year-plan of $802,500 and the money would come from the same sources as Option A. However, the monthly clean community fee would only be 16 cents.

Although there is a proposal, one of the hurdles the task force is facing is the actual planning. There can’t be much done if there is a proposal but no action is put into either of the plans. The money from the sources would go into a recycling program coordinator, 800 additional receptacles, 900 signs at all Parks and Recreation facilities, a park ground specialist, public education, temporary employees, and ongoing collection and hauling services. Rick Cofer is really pushing for the city to recycle and take up on either option in order to not just be a city that talks the talk about recycling and being environmentally friendly. To know more about Rick Cofer visit medium.com

https://www.kut.org/post/task-force-talks-trash-and-cash-recycling-all-austin-parks-and-facilities